Snyder daily sues county
over meeting violations
SNYDER — The Snyder Daily News filed a
lawsuit Aug. 24 alleging that the Scurry County Commissioners Court
has repeatedly violated the Texas Open Meetings Act.
The suit claims the commissioners reached decisions
without posting meetings and made decisions that circumvented the law.
“Even when executive session or closed meetings
are allowed for deliberations, all decisions or votes must be taken
in an open meeting,” publisher Roy McQueen said. “We regret having
to take such a drastic action. In more than 40 years in the news business,
we have never had to file a formal complaint. We have successfully urged
voluntary compliance through private discussions and editorials, but
this time to no avail.
“Because of the blatant disregard of the public’s
right to know, we are asking the district court to permanently enjoin
the commissioners court from transacting business behind closed doors.”
Attorney Don Richards of McWhorter, Cobb
and Johnson is representing the newspaper.
The case centers around a meeting where the county
discussed taking back operation of the Scurry County Coliseum.
Arlington e-mail battle
heads to court docket
ARLINGTON — City officials have filed a lawsuit
challenging a recent attorney general’s opinion that said city-related
e-mails to council members’ private computers should be public.
The city has claimed that it does not own the
computer to which the e-mails were sent and that releasing the messages
may violate privacy concerns.
The city also has said that city council members
conduct business only during public meetings.
School district must release
information
MIDLOTHIAN — Records showing the number of coaches
employed by the school district and their respective salaries are public
in spite of a lawsuit challenging Title IX compliance here, according
to an attorney general’s opinion.
Today Newspapers filed an open records’ request
for the information in April but the district sought an opinion because
of pending litigation.
The district released the information but omitted
parts of the request after receiving the opinion.
Laredo lawyer challenges
city’s closed meeting topic
LAREDO — A lawyer has filed a lawsuit against
the city claiming that an Aug. 24 budget hearing violated the Open Meetings
Act.
The city council went into executive session to
confer with its attorney, even though a closed session was not posted
on the agenda.
Three council members abstained from attending
the closed session involving the city’s hotel-motel tax law.
Ironically one of three was on the city council
in 1997 when he and two other members were indicted over open meetings
violations. The charges were later dropped after the three agreed to
attend training on open government.
The city attorney told the Laredo Morning Times
that the council could meet with its attorney any time it wanted.
Rowlett council comes under
meeting scrutiny
ROWLETT — A city councilwoman planned to file
a complaint with the district attorney’s office claiming meetings on
Aug. 1 and Aug. 14 violated state open government laws.
The city’s finance committee met to discuss insurance
proposals and asked members of the public to leave each of the meetings,
which also did not include a posted agenda. Three council members serve
on the committee.
The district attorney told the Rowlett Lakeshore
Times that the meetings appeared to violate the Open Meetings Act
because they gave the impression that the full council would rubber
stamp committee decisions since all but two councilmen serve on the
committee.
Auditor’s report remains closed pending
probe
MIDLAND — The attorney general’s office ruled
that an auditor’s report on alleged misuse of Midland County funds should
remain confidential.
The Midland Reporter-Telegram filed an
open records request for the report last May and the county asked the
AG’s office to rule on whether it should be released.
The report was handed over to the Texas Rangers,
who are investigating allegations of the Midland County district attorney’s
misuse of a forfeiture fund. Officials told the newspaper they hoped
to bring the case before a grand jury this month.
The AG’s office said the report was excepted from
disclosure because an investigation was pending and the releases might
interfere with the case.
City keeps copying fees
in place over objections
CORPUS CHRISTI — The city apparently plans to
keep its policy of charging $5 for police reports even though a state
agency recommended otherwise.
Hadassah Schloss, open records administrator
for the General Services Commission, recently sent a letter to the city
saying the fee was too high and that it can only charge 10 cents a page
for copying. The agency does not have enforcement functions.
Schloss told the Caller Times that many
cities confuse the exception to the copy fee rule that allows police
departments to charge $4 for accident reports but not offense reports.
The city estimated it would generate $82,000 from
the fee this year and would lose about $21,700 if the $5 fee was lowered.